User talk:Fullstackdev

Attacks on civilians during the Kobani protests

I have added an Amnesty International source which as to me is rather critical to the Kurdish liberation movement but viewed as mostly neutral by international observers. I hope you can refrain from reverting to inserting a half-sentence like you did last time. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC) Kobani olaylarının birebir canlı şahidi olarak ilkgün evime 20 metre uzaklıkta olan yerde gösteri yaptılar ve polis müdahale etmedi. Demirtaşın açıklamasından sonra gece bizim sokağımıza girerek tüm esnafın ve evlerin camlarını taşladılar. Bence bu konuyu hiç uzatma. Birebir şahidiyim. Ek olarak kaynakta ekledim. Yapılan şey bize benim mahalleme benim komşumun arabasına benim kasabımın camlarına yapılan bir saldırıdır. İçinde gram insanlık varsa kaynağını göstermeme rağmen yani eklememe rağmen bu maddeyi silmezsin.[reply]

October 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 18:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Specifically, unrelenting WP:BATTLEGROUND and ethno-national advocacy (WP:AA2, WP:KURDS).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 18:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fullstackdev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What do you mean by national ethnic advocacy? Please write the article I added that caused you to make this accusation. The changes I have made are also valid on the Wikipedia Turkish page. I want to know the reason for your strong reaction. What is the reason for this unconstructive behavior?Fullstackdev (talk) 19:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. See WP:GAB to understand how to write an acceptable unblock request. Note that the Turkish Wikipedia is a separate project with separate rules. Yamla (talk) 19:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't understand the nature of your confusion or your request otherwise. But ethno-national is the exact phrase I used. El_C 19:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 20:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)@El C:  What I want from you is what post is causing you to block me indefinitely.and I'm asking for policy information on which wikipedia policy this is against. Is it a nationalist movement for me to add an article with only Turkish sources to an article created with only Armenian sources? Why do you think the source and content I have added has a devastating effect on the article? What evidence do you have for this? I want you to send my articles that caused me to be suspended indefinitely.Fullstackdev (talk) 20:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: This action you have made makes me think that you are directed to an error. If you check this link, you can see that the propaganda accuser has created articles professionally. After seeing this twitter post, I did a little research.I saw that all of the articles were written with Armenian sources, and I understood that they had a one-sided point of view.So I added to the article with a Turkish source. and you immediately suspended me indefinitely. Is this a coincidence?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fullstackdev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What I want from you is what post is causing you to block me indefinitely.and I'm asking for policy information on which wikipedia policy this is against. Is it a nationalist movement for me to add an article with only Turkish sources to an article created with only Armenian sources? Why do you think the source and content I have added has a devastating effect on the article? What evidence do you have for this? I want you to send my articles that caused me to be suspended indefinitely.

Decline reason:

Please do not continue to use the block appeal template to continue a discussion; simply post your questions/comments on this talk page and sign with four tildes (~~~~). As Yamla requested above, please review WP:GAB before posting another appeal. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fullstackdev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not committed any policy violations. I've added a source to the changes I've made. I believe that I have been utterly prejudiced and indefinitely removed.The changes I have made are the changes that exist in the Turkish section, which is a wikipedia subpage, and are not against the policy.wikipedia general policies apply to all languages.I want my sentence lifted.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.