Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolf Steiner Archive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rudolf Steiner. ✗plicit 23:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolf Steiner Archive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the notability criteria for organizations; no substantial independent coverage found. Article creator was a single-purpose account with an undeclared conflict of interest. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete For WP:COI issues and no RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Four hits in Gnews, only one in English. Nothing notable. Oaktree b (talk) 02:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect This is not sufficient for an article, but it can be a section in the article on Rudolf Steiner. The redirect can point to that section.--23mason (talk) 16:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - as per User:23mason - plausible search term. WP:ATD. Ingratis (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.