Jump to content

Talk:Lilka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Reiro (talk | contribs) at 11:34, 22 January 2022 (→‎BLP issue). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

BLP issue

Reiro recently removed Lilka's real name but his claim is inconsitent with BLP policies. Lilka is not private individual because Lilka made many self-promotional activities.

In 2019, She became an K-league ambassador.[1] In February 2019, She became a cover model of Maxim Korea.[2] In September 2019, she designed many merchandise to promote her.[3][4]

Per WP:LOWPROFILE, Lilka is a public figure and high-profile individual.


On the other hands, Lilka's real name was mentioned in independent three reliable sources.[5][6][7] In January 2022, Lilka was criticized because she applied for trademark which are possibly named after Lille. Because she stayed a year at Lille Catholic University as an exchange student, It can be viewed as trademarks on a geographical location. WP:BLPPRIMARY said that where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source. Because Lilka intends to make other merchandise under her controversial trademarks, her real name should be public information to track the decision about her trademarks. Removing her real name results a significant loss of context.

Furthermore, Lilka intentionally mentioned her name in her internet broadcasting. In October 2021, Lilka showed her real name to viewers to prove non-existence of her boyfriend.[8]

  1. ^ "제기왕 이천수, 꽁병지TV를 아시나요". JoongAng Ilbo. March 15, 2019. p. Economy 06. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
  2. ^ "BJ 릴카, 실물 궁금해지는 인스타 속 완벽 미모…'에어프랑스' 재직 당시 눈길". Maeil Shinmun. January 30, 2019. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
  3. ^ "인기 유튜버 '릴카', 텀블벅 도전 나선다". Kyunghyang Games. September 27, 2019. Retrieved January 22, 2022.
  4. ^ "텀블벅 "미디어 크리에이터 펀딩 활발…굿즈·앨범 판매"". ZDNet Korea. September 27, 2019. Retrieved January 22, 2022.
  5. ^ "감스트♥릴카, 연인 임박? 실검까지 오른 방송, 어땠길래..." influencer dot com. August 12, 2018. Retrieved January 7, 2022.
  6. ^ "유명 유튜버 릴카, 지명에서 유래한 상표 출원 논란". Shinmoongo News. January 9, 2022. Retrieved January 17, 2022.
  7. ^ "릴카 "인트로 표절 기분 안 좋다"…표절 의혹 휩싸인 BJ 유혜디". UTAgate. Decomber 8, 2022. Retrieved January 22, 2022. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ "BJ 릴카, '커플링' 때문에 생긴 남자친구 의혹 해명→구매영수증 인증". Topstarnews. October 29, 2021. Retrieved January 22, 2022.

For these reasons, her real name should not be deleted. Horang2022 (talk) 08:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hands, Lilka intentionally published her birthday, birthplace, former occupation, former workplace and universities where she studied. Horang2022 (talk) 08:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Horang2022, she noticed that her broadcasts with personal information are deleted later, for her safety. She also told in Namuwiki that "suffering infringement of personal information." and "do not want to write them, including my real name."
In WP:BLPNAME, "When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations, it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context.". But, sources you displaying do not show her information, except 5,6, and 7; they are generally not considered as reliable sources in South Korea, due to churnalism and small media.
I already met some IPs in Korean Wikipedia, that claimed this way, with distortion of right to be forgotten (Who does adapt that to person suffering stalkers?). And I cannot state in detail, there are several inappropriate claim, not only violate WP:BLP, but also general moral. Reiro (talk) 11:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]