Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaserWriter 12/640 PS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:40, 28 January 2022 (Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 12:40, 28 January 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Apple printers. Shimeru (talk) 01:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LaserWriter 12/640 PS[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- LaserWriter 12/640 PS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Little notability, no references to indicate notability, and few additional refs possible (see Google), mainly from legacy databases. ℳøℕø 05:46, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Reliable ref for all of these printers available: "A look back at Apple's Printers". Benj Edwards, Macworld, Dec 10, 2009. There will also be reviews for each of them, which are also reliable refs. No attempt to follow WP:BEFORE in these or the other similar nominations. That said, the very similar printers of each group could probably be usefully merged. DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to an Apple Inc. printers article, with the other nominated printers. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 00:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 'cause there really isn't a whole lot to say about this model. It would probably be better to have an article on the whole class of Apple LaserWriter printers and give the data on each model there. Kitfoxxe (talk) 00:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into a List of Apple printers or List of Apple LaserWriter printers (or whatever) article, along with most of the stuff in Category:Apple Inc. printers. Failing that, keep - there would have been reliable, independent coverage in the form of, say, magazine reviews, even if they're not available online. Miracle Pen (talk) 06:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Not individually notable, but the Apple printers as a product line are probably notable (see DGG's link). --Cybercobra (talk) 06:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to a article listing Apple printers. 19:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.