Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cray Wanderers F.C. season 2009-10
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:43, 30 January 2022 (Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:43, 30 January 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 03:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cray Wanderers F.C. season 2009-10 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is a semi-professional team playing in a regional league, past consensus at WP:FOOTY has been that such teams do not merit individual season articles ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. – PeeJay 08:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 10:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. Everything that would be worth merging to the main article is there, and this title doesn't have merit as a term for redirection. Thryduulf (talk) 15:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Too far down the road of WP:NOTNEWS. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.