Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ardan International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ardan International

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, only coverage available seems to be routine announcements of acquisitions and product launches. Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There are citations giving evidence that this corporation exists, but not that there has been any reason for significant coverage in secondary sources. -Markeer 03:33, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per rationale at WP:SERIESA. FalconK (talk) 00:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to RL360°: The article text and references describe the company's senior personnel and sale, topics which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. I am not seeing evidence of notability. Acquisition of this company is summarised at RL360°#Subsidiaries, so a redirect is an option. AllyD (talk) 16:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.