Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King David Zilly Aggrey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Royal House of Grace International Church. Black Kite (talk) 19:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

King David Zilly Aggrey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Stanleytux (talk) 06:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Stanleytux (talk) 06:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Stanleytux (talk) 06:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Stanleytux (talk) 06:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete clearly fail WP:GNG and WP:RS Zazzysa (talk) 10:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt fails WP:ANYBIO. It should be noted that this subject has been created multiple times with different names like Prince David Zilly-Aggrey and Prince-David Zilly Aggrey —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or Weak keep: redirect to Royal House of Grace International Church, the congregation he overseers in Rivers State. I believe our criteria for BLP should be the strongest to pass, this passes it weakly for me. Darreg (talk) 10:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Potential keep -- The chief minister (here called "apostle") of a megachurch ought to be notable. The problem is that this is a BLP, which requires references (and we have but one - not enough). If kept, rename to his actual name (without "king/prince David"). If not kept, redirect per Darreg. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Google News/Newspapers/Books/Scholar search links above suggest that the only notable thing about him is that he has (for now) a Wikipedia article. If he is notable under another name then it isn't obvious. Dropping the possibly spurious title "King" still only yields one hit. I have no strong objection to a redirect, if this really is the name he is known by, but if the title "King" is spurious and this article name is only being used because the article is salted under other names then a redirect might not help anybody. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete based on the total lack of sources (both in the article and that are able to be found.) Being an "apostle" is basically a job title in a church and nothing more. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 01:28, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant player in Nigerian politics, head of very large church, sources available but "King" should perhaps be removed, I find him more often referred to as "Apostle". "Zilly Aggre" is a more useful search term. editors clicking on the new search term that I added above will find sources form which to expand the article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 21:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.