Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paint Pastel Princess
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:49, 31 January 2022 (Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:49, 31 January 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Silverchair_discography#Singles per WP:NSUPER. Consider this a no consensus close. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Paint Pastel Princess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be notable. Lachlanusername (talk) 09:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Dan arndt (talk) 03:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete whilst produced by a notable band, insufficient evidence of sources to meet WP:NALBUMS. LibStar (talk) 14:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 07:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Charted in Triple J Hottest 100, 2000, a nationally significant annual radio poll (albeit almost at the bottom at No.96), so meets WP:MUSIC. Orderinchaos 19:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.