Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancients (Farscape)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The proposed merge target does not exist. Sandstein (talk) 21:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ancients (Farscape)

Lacks the notability required of a Wikipedia article because it does not have the reliable secondary sources as noted in WP:FICT. Solely a summary of info found in the series without any reference to the real world seeing WP:NOT#PLOT. Bbwlover 05:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Bbwlover 05:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: Very weak. First of all, I know!. But all of the "Races and Factions" (listed here have articles. Apparently, they are notable? I am not familiar with this show. I am willing to be persuaded otherwise. - Rjd0060 05:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You remembered WP:WAX, but you may have forgotten WP:ALLORNOTHING. We don't have to deal with all of the problem articles at once. One at a time is acceptable, especially since the availability of sources on one topic doesn't necessarily mean anything about the availability of sources for a related topic. -- Jay32183 (talk) 20:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep for now but prefer Merge into Races in Farscape (the other races should be merged there also). This is one of the three races in Farscape that has a major relevance for the story, and it deserves some mention somewhere. This move would give interested editors time to establish notability, and if they really cannot come up with anything, this can still be deleted. – sgeureka ^t•c 11:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. -- Jay32183 (talk) 20:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I know an odd choice, but there is potential for this article to be saved but there is also enough to have it deleted. So I really could go either way on this one. Will wait to see how this discussion plays out before I add another comment. Æon ^{Insanity Now!} 23:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I doubt any independent references exist, certainly none have been added. Fails WP:FICT. Percy Snoodle (talk) 14:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It has no reliable sources and is completely original research. "Solely a summary of info found in the series without any reference to the real world . . . ." --Evb-wiki (talk) 13:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.