Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia – South Africa relations
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:49, 31 January 2022 (Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 07:49, 31 January 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Georgia – South Africa relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
another random combination with no resident embassies. I could find very little coverage of actual bilateral relations [1] except their 2 rugby union teams sometimes compete. LibStar (talk) 15:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with prejudice. "relations" articles as a genre not acceptable, due to inherent violation of synth. KillerChihuahua?!? 15:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Directory-like formulaic stub about non-notable subject, fails WP:N and WP:NOT. Edison (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 04:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 04:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above.Tyrenon (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence via reliable, independent sources that this relationship is notable at all.Bali ultimate (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable soruces adress these relations in the detail required for an article. Hipocrite (talk) 20:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.