Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adnan Gabeljić

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this is a WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE case, this is a few hours early by usual metrics, but given the clarity of the case I'm applying SNOW/IAR. joe decker ^talk 19:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adnan Gabeljić[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am the subject of the article and I am requesting it to be considered for deletion as my notability was only temporary and no longer relevant. It has been an impediment to my personal and professional life. Please understand. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolejaran (talk • contribs) 23:23, December 2, 2017 (UTC)

Delete Nothing about him makes him so notable we should have an article in contradiction of his wishes.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no significant coverage about him also that can establish notability. NFOOTY also not met. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:08, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the elements of WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE are met and there is no evidence of a need to retain. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.