Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Skinner
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:22, 1 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:22, 1 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Paul Skinner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Plays for a team that is not fully professional, so fails WP:NFOOTY and hasn't received significant media coverage so fails WP:GNG too. JMHamo (talk) 18:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep passes WP:NFOOTY as has played semi-competitive sport. Wikiproject Cricket have established this and you are not allowed to question it. And I see no reason why that shouldn't apply to football too. For the same reason, that trumps WP:GNG and also WP:BLP. I do not necessarily hold these views myself, but am voting in line with my understanding of policy, as has been explained to me. Thanks for your understanding. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Uhh, played in a semi-competitive sport. That is without a doubt a clear failure of WP:NFOOTBALL. And we're talking about football, not cricket. – Michael (talk) 00:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This looks like another case of someone making up their own criteria. Doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG.204.126.132.231 (talk) 20:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- How many times are we gonna have arguments like this? The article fails notability guidelines and rather than looking at the guidelines, people claim that "he's on the first team squad", "he's gonna make his debut soon", "he's a professional footballer", etc. Those arguments are never going to cut it. Also since I mentioned that this article fails the notability guidelines, I vote delete. – Michael (talk) 00:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.