Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Johnson (artist)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:06, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:06, 2 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:47, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tom Johnson (artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of significance or notability, no objective sources. JNW (talk) 18:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Can find no reliable source. Creator is SPA. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spa-created puff-piece for artist who is in no way notable. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 00:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.