Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UniversiTV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UniversiTV[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability that may fail WP:NME; few or no reliable sources covering the subject. Theenjay36 (talk) 07:49, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Theenjay36 (talk) 07:49, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Theenjay36 (talk) 07:49, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Concur with nominator's analysis. This is the first I've heard of the channel. I mean, eight years on there's only two cable operators running it? It may be for all I know, a 700 Club Asia geared for college students. --Eaglestorm (talk) 03:40, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Retarget~~ to ZOE Broadcasting Network, its parent network. The mentions that I found online is usually due to a typo of "university"--Lenticel ^(talk) 03:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it's not a good idea. For me, UniversiTV was never owned by ZOE but was just a blocktimer on the latter's channel 33. Theenjay36 (talk) 06:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah I see, Delete then. --Lenticel ^(talk) 08:46, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.