Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fusebill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 05:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fusebill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable; Most of the refs are local business journals and therefore not reliable sources, for what they publish is best considered as pure press releases. The other references are mere notices. DGG ( talk ) 03:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As a non-notable organization. Paviliolive (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Does not appear to meet WP:ORG. Stifle (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.