Talk:Ezhava
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ezhava article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
India: Kerala C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
Archive 1 (till Feb 15, 2007) Archive 2 (April 2007 - June 2007) Archive 3 (June 2007 - Dec 2007) Archive 4 (Jan 2008 – June 2011) Archive 5 (June 2011 – ) |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This page contains misleading informations
Please remove misleading informations from this page Techbot-2 Architect XL5K (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Defame a community as a whole
Following the British settlement in Kerala, some Thiyya families, mostly in Southern Malabar, were taken as concubines by European colonisers and subsequently had children. This community was referred to as "white Thiyyas". Whilst this was considered advantageous in the 18th and 19th centuries, this became a source of embarrassment in the 20th century. The Thiyyas in northern Malabar, although less likely to form "white-thiyya" families,
some families, reference book says that too in a small place called Thalassery maybe take it as 10 or 20 families, cannot be taken as the history of a community. Like 10-20 families were criminals doesn't mean generalization.
It is defaming the community as a whole and not a general history.
Please remove
Done. Don't agree with the argument of defaming, but yes, the larger approximation cannot be said using a small sample of data. Jcc611 (talk)
- C-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Kerala articles
- Mid-importance Kerala articles
- C-Class Kerala articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Kerala articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia articles under general sanctions