Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakhstan–Kosovo relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to International recognition of Kosovo. Tone 13:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakhstan–Kosovo relations[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no relations between these countries, as Kazakhstan does not recognise Kosovo. This fact is already covered in International_recognition_of_Kosovo#Entities_that_have_not_recognised_Kosovo_as_an_independent_state. As per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cape Verde–Kosovo relations. LibStar (talk) 00:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The content is notable and the article serves to hold content split from the International recognition of Kosovo article, where size constraints have become a problem. Other discussions on the topic have not agreed to delete the articles for the same reason, as it is the case in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic Republic of the Congo–Kosovo relations. Last but not least, a possible alternative before considering deletion is moving the article to the Kazakhstan's reaction to the Kosovo declaration of independence title. --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. They may not have formal diplomatic relations, but so. They have a history of saying things about each other, or anyway the Kazakhs do. Yes it's covered in International_recognition_of_Kosovo#Entities_that_have_not_recognised_Kosovo_as_an_independent_state, and since this article is short you could merge them. But why? International recognition of Kosovo is pretty long already, and you probably don't want more than a paragraph on each entry. So you have that, then a pointer to this article for more detailed info. And there is more detailed info, couple quotes and all, but also importantly there's room to stretch and add more material if and when new events occur and/or editors want to. International recognition of Kosovo doesn't provide room for expansion really. Not seeing the downside to keeping the article. Herostratus (talk) 06:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Really, the only cost that the article and the description in International recognition of Kosovo might drift out of sync. But, the cost of a redirect is also very small; the page name will still exist, ready to be expanded in case new reliable sources become available to motivate a stand-alone article on the subject. Suriname0 (talk) 20:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The standard for a stand alone article is significant coverage in reliable independent sources, and I'm not seeing that. Yilloslime (talk) 20:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I would also support redirecting to International recognition of Kosovo. Yilloslime (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no significant coverage of their relations. Only few sources on statements made about each other. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to International recognition of Kosovo - I would propose a Merge, but the target article already contains all of the relevant information contained in this article. Functionally, I don't see that the subject of the article meets WP:GNG. Suriname0 (talk) 20:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to International recognition of Kosovo or delete. Not enough in-depth, secondary, reliable coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Redirects are cheap. Pilaz (talk) 08:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.