Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Plains Systems
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:44, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- North Plains Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unambiguous advertising for a non-notable software business. This has been suggested for speedy deletion before and rejected. Article is full of obviously promotional language:
- a provider of Digital Asset Management solutions
- ideally suited for deployment at small and medium sized corporations that need a full featured implementation
- a line of easy to use point solution Digital Asset Management products
- offers a best of both worlds approach to managing rich media
They do seem addicted to the habit of referring to their products as "solutions".
The flagrant promotional nature of the text means that this article should be deleted even if the business were notable; but it's not. Google News yields a fair number of links, but they all seem to be press releases. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
- Strong delete. Over the top spam. Would require a complete rewrite to be encyclopedic even if notable. Particularly impressive is the fact that past the 1st sentence the only wikilinked term is feature-rich. Pcap ping 22:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. JBsupreme (talk) 09:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.