Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tay al-Ard
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:35, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:35, 4 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (Non-admin closure) LittleMountain5 17:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tay al-Ard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This subject of this article is not noteworthy. I question (as have others) even the existence of the feature in question: I call bullshit on this article, and let me tell you, I have seen some questionable and esoteric things in my time... But Teleportation in Islam seriously takes the cake. Ogress smash! 08:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Ogress smash! 08:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Weird though it is, it is found referred to in books: [1] [2] and a few esoteric websites. Possibly should be a sub-article in an Islam article, but not bs. Collect (talk) 15:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Like in the first AfD, the concept is the subject of secondary sources in addition to the ones found by Collect. --Oakshade (talk) 15:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep In addition to the sources found by Collect, more sources are available by doing a simple Google Search. --J.Mundo (talk) 15:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Articles are not deleted because a user "calls bullshit" on it, if verifiable sources mention it. Nobody's saying the phenomenon exists, any more than an article on any other item of faith is advocating its existence.Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 16:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - for all the reasons outlined above. Tris2000 (talk) 17:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.