Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-India Swami Sahajanand Day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 01:52, 5 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 01:52, 5 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Swami Sahajanand Saraswati. Mgm|(talk) 10:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- All-India Swami Sahajanand Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability. Google search returns some results and only one appears related to the subject of this article. See this and this. From the style of writing used, I also suspect that the article could be copyvio. The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 16:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to biography - Verifiable fact as the editor has given ISBN #; page 95 here but no other coverage to justify a complete article. —SV 18:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm! Most of this article appears to be copyvio, too.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 16:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Swami Sahajanand Saraswati where it is already mentioned And looking at this editor's edits, a large proportion of them appear to be copyvio, and since he hasn't responded to any of the many notifications he's had, I've indef blocked him making it clear that he needs to respond and make it clear he understands and will follow our policy to be unblocked. . I see he is a suspected sock also. Dougweller (talk) 10:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 00:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.