Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Know Pratibha Patil (2nd nomination)
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:47, 5 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect per nom/consensus. Talk page should have had the afd history on it though. WP:NAC TheWeakWilled (T * G) 01:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Know Pratibha Patil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article on a temporary (and now defunct) website created by one political party to criticize Pratibha Patil, who was nominated was presidency of India by another political alliance. The article fails WP:NOTNEWS and arguably WP:COATRACK and WP:BLP (though, to be fair, it is written neutrally). See also G. N. Patil and Kisan Dhage, which were created during the same period, and which I have nominated for deletion too. Abecedare (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 21:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: I didn't realize that this article had been AFD's earlier and the decision was to redirect it to Indian presidential election, 2007. That decision was undone by an IP, and I am fine with this AFD being closed early and the article being redirected (not closing it myself out of abundance of caution). Abecedare (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect (not doing it myself this early just to verify consensus before doing this speedily) There is no indication that the article should remain, the IP user undid an edit which was the outcome of an AfD discussion without making any assertion that it should remain or change to make it a candidate for inclusion. No content edits have been made since the undoing of the AfD decision. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 21:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.