User talk:Horope
Blocked for sockpuppetry
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Horope (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] keeps on saying [[WP:SO]] is my "best bet" - yet I believe the block has been there long enough for it to be lifted. I personally regret using an account for strawman sockpuppetry. If lifted, I can continue my work on Wikipedia. I understand my breaching of Wikipedia rules was a gross one, but one chance should be given, especially after looking at my contributions. It gives away my goals. Since the block here is apparently on the person, and wouldn't be lifted until it is on the main account, can it be lifted here? Please check the 7,000+ contributions on [[User:Danloud]] and [[User:Mspriz]]. But clearly, restricting a user and declining the request gives some people some sort of a dominating feeling. I've requested many times, twice on Danloud, once on Mspriz, and finally here. Please realise, I have understood my mistake and promise to avoid it. [[User:Horope|Horope]] ([[User talk:Horope#top|talk]]) 14:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] keeps on saying [[WP:SO]] is my "best bet" - yet I believe the block has been there long enough for it to be lifted. I personally regret using an account for strawman sockpuppetry. If lifted, I can continue my work on Wikipedia. I understand my breaching of Wikipedia rules was a gross one, but one chance should be given, especially after looking at my contributions. It gives away my goals. Since the block here is apparently on the person, and wouldn't be lifted until it is on the main account, can it be lifted here? Please check the 7,000+ contributions on [[User:Danloud]] and [[User:Mspriz]]. But clearly, restricting a user and declining the request gives some people some sort of a dominating feeling. I've requested many times, twice on Danloud, once on Mspriz, and finally here. Please realise, I have understood my mistake and promise to avoid it. [[User:Horope|Horope]] ([[User talk:Horope#top|talk]]) 14:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] keeps on saying [[WP:SO]] is my "best bet" - yet I believe the block has been there long enough for it to be lifted. I personally regret using an account for strawman sockpuppetry. If lifted, I can continue my work on Wikipedia. I understand my breaching of Wikipedia rules was a gross one, but one chance should be given, especially after looking at my contributions. It gives away my goals. Since the block here is apparently on the person, and wouldn't be lifted until it is on the main account, can it be lifted here? Please check the 7,000+ contributions on [[User:Danloud]] and [[User:Mspriz]]. But clearly, restricting a user and declining the request gives some people some sort of a dominating feeling. I've requested many times, twice on Danloud, once on Mspriz, and finally here. Please realise, I have understood my mistake and promise to avoid it. [[User:Horope|Horope]] ([[User talk:Horope#top|talk]]) 14:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- One of the two socks you noted, Mspriz, was socking as recently as a few days ago before they were CU-blocked. No one is going to even consider unblocking you for at least six months without socking.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Bbb23 My IP ban expired on November 2021, and I used my account Mspriz, to literally gain about a 1,000 edits, a Million Award, and even elect an article to GA. What type of sockpuppeting is that? I clearly am here to build a Wikipedia, and that's evident through my edits. Even after seeing my edits, I should be given a second chance. I've waited for 3 months after my main account Danloud got banned along this account. I have no other choices to continue my editing since I'm restricted. That is why I am asking the ban to be lifted. I had done a mistake, and I regret it. The block occurred on August, it has been six months. Horope (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)