Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix Critics Circle Award for Best International Film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In most cases with only one !vote I'd relist, but given the detailed analysis conducted by Tokyogirl79 and the fact the parent organisation's article has been deleted this is enough to tip into a delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix Critics Circle Award for Best International Film

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for notability of this award. DGG ( talk ) 07:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It might be worth asking if the Phoenix Critics Circle itself would warrant an article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:45, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've opened an AfD for the PCC itself and the other award pages here. To sum things up as a whole about the organization, while looking for sources I found that there really wasn't any coverage about the PCC that wasn't primary, self-published, or in a location that Wikipedia would consider to be notable. Sometimes an award can gain coverage by reliable sources reporting on the results, but I didn't see where anyone had really covered these awards at all, not even to list that they were handed out. I think that part of this is because the organization is fairly new, as it was founded in September 2014, making it about a little over a year old. So far no one has really commented on them or the awards anywhere. The only halfway decent coverage came from a ballot mention in AZ Central by a group member (making it primary) and a listing of results by Filmreel, which I'm not entirely sure would be considered a RS by Wikipedia. Even if Filmreel was usable, they're the only ones that are actually reporting the results and it wouldn't be enough by itself to show notability. It's incredibly difficult for organizations to pass GNG on Wikipedia because the bar for notability is much higher, so I think that it's at best WP:TOOSOON for the group or any of its awards to have articles. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.