Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malvīne Stučka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mis Latvija#Miss Earth Latvia. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 03:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Malvīne Stučka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She almost won Miss Latvia 2014. She was appointed to attend Miss Earth 2015 for Latvia, but did not go for undisclosed reasons. The barely RS here are about the Miss Earth event she did not go to. She needs a lot more then this to pass WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG. Legacypac (talk) 03:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 08:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 08:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She is a runner up who didn't go to compete at a higher level. That sounds non-notable to me.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:47, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 08:54, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or redirect to appropriate article; runner up is not notable.
Redirect to Mis Latvija#Miss Earth Latvia. Apparently she actually won this particular pageant - not that the article mentions that, only the succession box at the bottom of the article. This doesn't seem to be enough for notability but it does make a redirect reasonable and plausible and, after all, redirects are cheap. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's confusing, but it seems she was 1st runner up but later awarded the title so she could compete at the global event, but then didn't for no stated reason. Anyway not notable. This pageant company likes to list all the women who could have competed but didn't actually show up (withdraws in industry speak) in a separate section of an infobox, which is how I found this string of names to nominate. Any that did not have a clear claim to notability beyond not being in Miss Earth pageant at all got nominated. Legacypac (talk) 07:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.