Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Kitty Spencer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Kitty Spencer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can see, this woman has done nothing of note. Being "a niece of Diana, Princess of Wales" does not confer notability, per WP:NOTINHERITED. Perhaps a redirect to her father's article would be better. Edwardx (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being mentioned in vacuous articles is not a sign of notability. Nor is being a guest at a wedding.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject needs to be notable to have a stand alone article in Wikipedia. This falls under WP:INVALIDBIO as being a niece to Diana is not notable enough. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 17:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, agree has done nothing notable. Tacyarg (talk) 22:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.