Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Wilson (comedian)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Wilson (comedian)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any significant coverage of this subject - or her comedy or writing - that would meet WP:GNG. Though she has written books, the only coverage of them seems to non-independent or insignificant; there are no reviews of her work that would meet WP:AUTHOR. Searches only turn up hits at places like Wordpress blogs, personal sites, and Amazon listings. I can't find anything to indicate that the INDIEFAB award is notable. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:59, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:59, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:59, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, well known author, and sources are fairly good, they are not all blogs includes YouTube video which is creditable. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The previous comment was moved here from above the nomination, to get the discussion in chronological order --bonadea contributions talk 19:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing the relevant notability criteria WP:NAUTHOR, WP:ENT, and WP:GNG. The sourcing is either primary or else trivial mentions. The YouTube video is a recording of one of her performances, which doesn't show notability. One of her books has been shortlisted for awards, but those awards don't appear to be notable, and being a finalist (as opposed to winning) an award is almost never a claim to notability. --bonadea contributions talk 19:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 01:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no references are independent reliable sources which show that the author is notable as an author.--Rpclod (talk) 14:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.