Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber Girl of the Year

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber Girl of the Year

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indiscriminate collection of information and significant RS coverage not found. The honour listed is not significant and well-known; the article on the program has been deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playboy Cyber Club (2nd nomination). All recipients are non-notable, so the article does not work as a list either.

The page has been previously deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playboy Cyber Club, and then restored via DVR. However, all articles that were part of the DVR have since been deleted. This is the lone hold-out and should be deleted as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG, lacking non-trivial coverage by independent reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:GNG. Ajf773 (talk) 22:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 02:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.