Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial Semiconductor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cavium. czar ⨹ 21:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Celestial Semiconductor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be notable as per Wikipedia guidelines. No references provided. Google search did not provide anything substantial. Please add references if notable. May also be merged to Cavium Networks Lakun.patra (talk) 14:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Cavium. One line in the Acquisitions tables (with EE Times cite) should be enough. I fixed the dead link to their old company overview, which described their chips = video and media processing SoCs. But there is no evidence at Cavium website that they are making those kind of chips now, and very little on Google except that it got acquired. – Margin1522 (talk) 23:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (gas) @ 21:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough significant coverage in news. Cavium article is also problematic while their is some what more coverage still may not have significant coverage there. Spshu (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cavium. Could not establish independent notability for Celestial Semiconductor. ~KvnG 02:44, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.