Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Supertanno (talk | contribs) at 15:13, 7 February 2022 (→‎Camp WWE: Requesting semi-protection of Camp WWE.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Somalia War (2006–2009)

Reason: Various sockpuppets and IPs vandalize the article by removing references and referenced content. Fontaine347 (talk) 14:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Is this is a subject area covered by some sort of sanctions? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra: I believe that WP:ARBHORN applies. Favonian (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Done as a regular admin action, but good to know DS can be used if needed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Akhaa Ahli Aley FC

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 12:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit in about one week isn't enough disruption for a page to be semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bourj FC

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 12:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit in about one week isn't enough disruption for a page to be semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Safa SC

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 12:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit in about one week isn't enough disruption for a page to be semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sagesse SC (football)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 12:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit in about one week isn't enough disruption for a page to be semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shabab El Bourj SC

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 12:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit in about one week isn't enough disruption for a page to be semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AC Tripoli

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 12:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit in about one week isn't enough disruption for a page to be semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shabab Al Sahel FC

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 12:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit in about one week isn't enough disruption for a page to be semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tadamon Sour SC

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 12:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit in about one week isn't enough disruption for a page to be semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Malpura

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, despite IP rangeblocking, asking for raising its protection for third time within a month. Sajaypal007 (talk) 12:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wanderlei Silva

Reason: High level of vandalism by IP/editor NEDOCHAN (talk) 13:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

St Peter's Catholic School, Solihull

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:38, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dael Fry

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tudor Grange Academy, Solihull

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – School kids bent on wrecking local school articles (see also St Peter's Catholic School, Solihull‎ which is probably being targeted by the same individual(s).  Velella  Velella Talk   14:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined a few edits over the last 6 months is not "persistent". « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 AFC Cup

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP editors with unsourced content, request for a longer protection Jasonyauyc2003 (talk) 14:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Camp WWE

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, despite two earlier temporary semi-protects. I'm explicitly requesting an indefinite semi-protection this time, as temporary protections have not stopped this issue that has been ongoing for several months now. Supertanno (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&oldid=1070456153"