Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Noriega

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (note re Spanneraol's comment, signing is unlikely to change his notability under BLP/N until April, so I chose not to relist.) j⚛e decker ^talk 03:34, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriel Noriega

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor league player, doesn't pass GNG or ATHLETE. Unsourced so even if he signs, merging wouldn't work. Wizardman 16:27, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Spanneraol (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. BenLinus1214 (talk) 17:26, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG.--Yankees10 18:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although you can find some sources, he does not meet the criteria of WP:MLB/N. Mhhossein (talk) 05:48, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- If he meets WP:GNG he doesn't need to meet WP:MLB/N also. Rlendog (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note... he signed with the Royals today. Spanneraol (talk) 04:55, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.