Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IgnitionDesk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:12, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:12, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 03:33, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- IgnitionDesk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, cannot find coverage. Article was written by two single-purpose users; this is WP:ARTSPAM. Haakon (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - cannot find any third party reliable sources to attest to notability. Theserialcomma (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources no article. Miami33139 (talk) 06:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I concur. Zero ghits in news or books for this. Pcap ping 21:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.