Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Regina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:52, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Regina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a non-notable actress. All her credits are minor...just essentially as extras or one guest appearance roles. Her documentary is called "award winning," but there is nothing to back that up. Two of the sources are her IMDB page and another is a YouTube video. One is a local news piece for a small, local theater fundraiser she did. The 5th source is an article about her being a victim of assault. Nothing makes a claim to notability that can be defended through reliable sources. only (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She filed a suit against her ex-fiance (Today.com) and spoke about her experiences with domestic violence (heraldnews.com, carrollcountytimes.com, and nptelegraph.com). She also got coverage on an anti-bullying film that she plans to shoot (courierpostonline.com and nj.com). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a well-documented person with the Inquirer article especially showing notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dthomsen8 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 17 January 2014‎

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.