Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable operas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:43, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per my note below. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The opera corpus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant to List of important operas.

The two articles share identical scope (though not content: this one is an indiscriminately bloated and completely unreferenced assortment, the other one is a Featured List). I see no prospects for a merger so this one has to go. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 07:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This list is currently listed here, at AfD, and it's PRODed at the same time; shouldn't it be one or the other? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't PRODed, it was SPEEDYed. The way to contest a CSD is to click the link in the template (which I have already done, but more people can do it as well I suppose). Softlavender (talk) 10:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.