Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NookieChat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NookieChat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page for a nn business. Significant RS coverage not found. Article sourced to passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP sources. Created by Special:Contributions/KingofEnggs currently indef blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:04, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:04, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 05:05, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -It is website though the indeffed user mangled things. By the content of the sources and their reliability it totally fails general WP:GNG and specific WP:NWEB. One article from AVN is announcement of launching likewise the rest are short descriptions. No substantial coverage to establish notability. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:Corp; advert piece of a non-notable website/company. Kierzek (talk) 17:02, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with above comments SeraphWiki (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.