Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tisserie
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:57, 9 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:57, 9 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Nishkid64 01:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, non-neutral, ad-tagged... Metao 02:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no attempt to establish WP:N through WP:V. Shaundakulbara 03:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources evidencing notability per WP:CORP. The principle claim of notability -- inclusion in the "Union Square Chocolate Lovers Tour" -- appears not to fall within one of the WP:CORP notability criteria. --Shirahadasha 05:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete very limited coverage in published sources. All I see are one New York Times and one New York Sun article when it opened basically just announcing that fact. -SpuriousQ 14:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I started all of this and I appreciate your input. I am more interested in bringing to WP notable architectural developements around Union Square, including those related to gentrification of the areas and also to David Rockwell and his firm The Rockwell Group. He is based in Union Square, is highly respected in the field, and has done now both North corners of Union Square (the high-end bakery, Tisserie, and the W Union Square hotel.) I have brought the article back to a short stub stage. It is, from the beginning, an architecture-stub. I agree that background info on the business behind Tisserie should not be allowed, but the project is an outstanding piece of Rockwelliana. I am reposting the picture Rockwell interior design.--Gkklein 23:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I know almost nothing about architecture, but it sounds like you want an article about David Rockwell or the Rockwell Group instead. I'd suggest working on such an article, and possibly redirecting Tisserie there, if you intend the content here to be primarily about the architecture and not the bakery Tisserie. Currently though the David Rockwell article's notability is also questionable since there are no cited reliable sources. -SpuriousQ 23:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.