Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Ercole
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:48, 9 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:48, 9 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think "Treasurer of the United States Merchant Marine Academy Employees Association" passes WP:N/WP:BIO and there doesn't appear to be any RS coverage of the man as the hits are, with two possible exceptions, for others with the same name. Filtering ghits for relevancy returns one non-wiki/mirror, a mention of his attendance at an event Travellingcari (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, this is close to giving WP:BIO passage to local shop stewards. --Dhartung | Talk 07:32, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, appears to be a minor union official. While such work is very important, it doesn't in and of itself make you notable. Lankiveil (complaints | disco) 12:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete - position is not notable, and there are no reliable sources to say otherwise -- Whpq (talk) 17:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.