Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Creighton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Creighton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: non-notable executive whose sole claim to notability and whose article was created solely as a result of accusations of sexual misconduct vis a vis Weinstein effect. Quis separabit? 23:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete As pres of Vice he should be notable, however, it does seem the only sources available run afoul of NOTNEWSPAPER and BLP1E. With no prejudice for recreating the article later, I support delete. DocumentError (talk) 01:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 02:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 02:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can locate no feature articles nor newspaper or magazine profiles of the subject, making him a non-notable company exec aside from the occasional mention in articles prior to the sexual assault accusations and settlements. The sexual assault claims are already included in the Wikipedia Vice Media article here [1]. The Andrew Creighton article feels like a Wikipedia:SINGLEEVENT. Fails notability. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 04:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing indepdently notable about Creighton. Might be notable in the context of a larger article on media executives forced out on accusations of sexual harrassment, but not enough for a stand alone article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is not enough source material to support a Wikipedia biography article. Also, as AuthorAuthor points out, the source material already is covered in Wikipedia Vice Media article. -- Jreferee (talk) 18:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as oer AuthorAuthor There is simply no demonstrable notability found here. Lacypaperclip (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.