Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10th Street Station
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:42, 10 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 10:42, 10 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. It's true that proposed things don't always go as planned. Nja247 18:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 10th Street Station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Proposed stations tend to fail WP:CRYSTAL, prod removed Delete Secret account 12:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources shown to establish notability of a proposed rail station. Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that is proposed, and crystal-ball rail stations are not inherently notable. (Parenthetic note: If it should somehow survive AFD, since there are a great number of "10th Street"s in the world, the title of an article such as this should include the city.) Edison (talk) 15:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Disambiguate with 9–10th & Locust (PATCO station) and Tenth Street/Promenade (Metromover station). --NE2 02:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It's not a "proposed" station because it's been approved to be built.[1] No crystal ball anymore. --Oakshade (talk) 02:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes it's still a crystal ball until contruction starts, being approved to be built isn't nothing, there are many stuctures that are approved to contruct and nothing happened. Secret account 12:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In light of Oakshade's revelation, I'm going to have to vote to Keep the article. ----DanTD (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia doesn't need to have an article for every light rail stop in Minneapolis. There just needs to be an article covering the overall project, which there is. One specific station is not adequate for an article unless there is some historical or political significance. Renaissancee (talk) 23:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.