Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attractive Nuisance
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:20, 11 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:20, 11 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Merging may be further discussed on article talk page. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:32, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Attractive Nuisance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged since may 2010, correction action has not been taken. Nobody Ent 15:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The band The Loud Family seems kind of minor, so individual articles on each of their albums are probably not needed. In this case there is only one review, on a site that seems to review everything, so notability is not established. BigJim707 (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. http://www.loudfamily.com/old/nuisrvu.html quotes 7 reviews from major newspapers in two countries. --GRuban (talk) 16:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. as per --GRuban. On the loudfamily website, the newspaper links to the official newspaper websites don't link up. This is 1 newspaper article's example which hasn't been linked but does exist http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-04-30/news/0004300101_1_loud-family-power-pop-band-members. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogerzzip (talk • contribs) 21:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC) Rogerzzip (talk) 21:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to The Loud Family. The band is notable, as shown by sources provided, but one article on it should be enough. Borock (talk) 00:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The reviews quoted on the band's site seem to be discussing their whole body of work, not specifically this album (although it is mentioned by some). Borock (talk) 00:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to The Loud Family per Borock. Nobody Ent 03:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The reviews are reviews of this album, or on the occasion of this album, principally treating of it above any other work.[1][2]Patrick Foster's Time Out review[3] [4] It meets any definition of notable. And no, Allmusic doesn't "review everything". 86.44.40.0 (talk) 15:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.