Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjab Police Bahawalpur
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:39, 11 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 10:39, 11 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Punjab Police Bahawalpur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Most of the text on this page was copied from Punjab Police and Bahawalpur, respectively. What is left is merely a non-notable directory-type listing about a local police station. R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is the local office of a state police authority that already has an article. It does not appear to be notable and the article is quite confusing because it appears to be an article about the entire state police authority. Also there may be some copyright issues involved in the copy & paste. Drawn Some (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree, the article duplicates a large amount of material in a confusing way. And a lot of what is there is not adequately sourced. And I think the name of the article "Punjab Police Bahawalpur" is confusing and unlikely to be searched for. Cazort (talk) 18:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.