Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liza Maza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liza Maza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. CombatWombat42 (talk) 22:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep appears to meet WP:NPOL through her representation on 13th Congress of the Philippines. Amortias (T)(C) 22:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Use of the find sources links shows enough material to suggest the individual is notable. Suggest per WP:BLP any contentious material that cannot be cited to a reliable source is simply removed. ~~Apologies to the nominator but the deletion review seems a knee jerk reaction to a legal threat.~~ W C M_email 22:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User: Wee Curry Monster Please retract your personal attack, making assumptions about my motive is neither productive nor necessary.CombatWombat42 (talk) 22:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a personal attack, please don't assume it was. I presumed your motivation was to protect wikipedia. Regards, W C M_email 23:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - clearly notable: WP:NPOL presumes notability for persons who serve in a national government, and indeed there appears to be coverage in multiple reliable sources, for example [1], [2], [3], [4]. Granted the article could use expansion and more inline citations but those are not criteria for deletion. Ivanvector (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: meets WP:NPOL as a representative in the 13th Congress of the Philippines and WP:BASIC. Ivanvector has provided some sources that indicate that the subject meets WP:BASIC. Esquivalience ^t 22:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:POLITICIAN as a member of a national legislature. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. National politician, coverage by multiple sources. 32.216.140.250 (talk) 00:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.