Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petitcodiac Riverkeeper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn--180.172.239.231 (talk) 06:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Petitcodiac Riverkeeper[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't sem to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Plenty of coverage to meet WP:GNG. I quickly found the following: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Tchaliburton (talk) 05:22, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:ORGDEPTH per available sources that cover the organization. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominaion withdrawn Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 05:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.