Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Westin Excelsior Rome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) RadioFan (talk) 00:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Westin Excelsior Rome[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not clear how this might meet notability guidelines. Acting as temporary HQ for an WWII American General seems more like trivia than a claim of notability. RadioFan (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Major five-star hotel in an historic building on a major street in a major city. I think we can give it the benefit of the doubt. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's sufficient sources to establish this as a legitimate modern landmark in Rome. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with the above. It has multiple sourced claims to fame/notability. It's not the most famous hotel ever, but it has location, as mentioned, in its favor, as well. I think it just makes it past the notability threshold. Scarlettail (talk) 01:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's long and varied history, as multiple sources spanning decades indicate, do give indication of notability. --Oakshade (talk) 05:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - number of sources indicate sufficient notability.--Staberinde (talk) 16:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.