Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Lincoln

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Lincoln[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability, his involvement in Atwater v. Lago Vista is not enough to warrant an article of his own. Also has some WP:BLP issues. KDLarsen (talk) 19:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This has so many BLP issues, that we need to delete it expeditiously. I will remove the NPOV violating language before that.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Biography of one notable event. Major BLP problems. Not finding significant RS coverage. Just passing mentions related to the subject's involvement in the birther movement and lots of hits on activist websites. Fails WP:GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.