Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric M. Jackson (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:50, 13 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:50, 13 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was originally nominated for deletion here. Though because it was affected significantly by sockpuppeting (checkuser), I relisted the nomination. WinHunter (talk) 12:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(original nom statement) article was created by the person himself for hyping purposes. does not appear to be a notable person or notable enough to be included in wikipedia Wikiyoman 00:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Very, Very Weak Keep - Seems verifiable, and notable enough, but only, only just. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.35.102.213 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. The book alone seems enough to make him marginally notable; coupled with his other activities, it seems sufficient to satisfy notability. Dsreyn 16:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Sourced, mildly notable, I see no reason to delete --Wildnox 20:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. His book passes WP:BOOK, thus he does by extension per WP:BIO. Prominent author and Conservative activist. Ohconfucius 05:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above comments. TGreenburg 23:55, 9 September 2006
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.