Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ijin Material

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 05:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ijin Material

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't really see anything to indicate in-depth notability on a quick search and sources check. Article is excessively promotional and unsourced, and may be copyvio from somewhere. It was certainly created by someone whose ID suggests a clear conflict of interest. Mabalu (talk) 02:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As well as being promotional it seems to be a copyright violation from [1]. The text used to be closer, but wikipedians have corrected some of the spelling problems in the original - "artisinal", "principle", and "aswell" - something the commercial site still hasn't managed to do! - Ttwaring (talk) 03:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm beginning to wonder if I should have nominated this so quickly. A more careful search shows substantial published coverage in 1, plus 2 appears to have some coverage. The designer, Philip Goss, has presence on some of the more reputable (but still not really RS) blogs such as Denimaniac, which does give food for thought. Certainly no problem with this being deleted as copyvio, though, with no prejudice against a properly sourced recreation. Mabalu (talk) 12:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.