Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vgfx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 00:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vgfx

Not the subject of independent coverage in reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilary T (talk • contribs)

Comment New user, has no edits outside AFD. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this so important to you? anyway I used to be Hilary T In Shoes but this is easier to type. Hilary T (talk) 20:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC) And I did have even more edits but someone got them deleted. Hilary T (talk) 20:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I didn't really mean anything accusatory by it, it's just that it's sometimes a little suspicious when someone only contributes to xfd. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. JBsupreme (talk) 20:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge Self referencing documentation lists it as Development Status: Alpha. I found no mention of it used it any widely used software or any software for that matter. We can probably merge it into an article on vector graphics, and people with better subject knowledge can determine if its notable enough to remain in the article. DatabaseBot (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mfield (Oi!) 06:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Four thousand Google hits are far below the typical expectancy for a graphics engine. —Admiral Norton ^(talk) 15:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.