Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uvuru-agada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK 1. Also suggested deletion by speedy deletion criteria Wikipedia:CSD A1 and just all around false. (non-admin closure) Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 20:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uvuru-agada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article Alvin the Almighty (talk) 10:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm not sure how you consider this to be "lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article" — it's quite explicitly about "a community in Uzo Uwani LGA, Enugu State, Nigeria". If your concern is about the article's short size, this isn't a reason for deletion, it's perfectly reasonable to keep it as a stub. If it's about the subject's notability, then per WP:GEOLAND "populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low". A cursory glance on Google reveals sufficient evidence that the place does actually exist. I've just edited the article to add an infobox & co-ordinates too. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 11:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GEOLAND. A quick Google search confirms its existence as a named populated place. Also, this is not the first nomination from this editor where he has been reminded of GEOLAND in cases such as this and to continue to bring these to Afd seems to be WP:POINTy behaviour and rather a waste of time. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:55, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.