Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Origin of Painting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Origin of Painting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find evidence of notability. I did manage to find this from The Independent, but it doesn't mention the subject by name. I have been unable to verify the other quotes, but if this one is from 2000, they could be in the print editions. I can find very little online about this. Adam9007 (talk) 02:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:PROMO. An art installation/exhibit that happened, but no evidence of notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - coverage doesn't demonstrate notability. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.