Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain Fitness Program

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Fitness Program

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, no news mentions, etc. refs are for general research studies and not about the product. is an advertisement. CerealKillerYum (talk) 13:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very non-notable promotional article that appears to be its only purpose. Refs are also incredibly confusing to follow. BenLinus1214 (talk) 19:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete To me it looks ~~like it might be a scam~~ rather dubious. I went to the BrainHQ website and looked at the abstracts of some of the "70 published studies" by "an international team of more than 100 top neuroscientists". For example, the abstract of one study on falling by seniors said "interventions to improve cognition and health might also be effective." BrainHQ's description of this study was "Study Description: This study found that poor BrainHQ performance is correlated with fall risk, and therefore BrainHQ is recommended to improve fall risk in older adults." Despite the fact that BrainHQ wasn't mentioned in the abstract. Or any of the other abstracts. The paper itself is behind a paywall so I can't tell for sure, but I saw no evidence that any of these studies had anything to do with BrainHQ. Delete per WP:PROMOTION. – Margin1522 (talk) 20:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.